(877) 208-0021 prs@auaus.net

PSE&G savings for a fortune 500 client when we switched suppliers

07/03/05
$19,262.08 What PSE&G would have charged. This is for the 12-2011 time period
$13,520.21 What ConEd charged
$5,741.87 Savings multiply by 35$% $2,009.65

02/01/12 $18,119.65 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,818.92 What ConEd charged
$7,300.73 Savings multuiply by 35$% $2,555.26

03/01/12 $13,906.20 What PSE&G would have charged. This is for the 3-2012 time period
$7,936.04 What ConEd charged
$5,970.16 Savings multuiply by 35$% $2,089.56
$1,965.88 Savings multuiply by 35$% $688.06

04/01/12 $12,509.11 What PSE&G would have charged. This is for the Dec 2011 time period
$6,386.08 What ConEd charged
$6,123.03 Savings multuiply by 35$% $2,143.06

05/01/12 $14,873.69 What PSE&G would have charged. This is for the Dec 2011 time period
$9,969.00 What ConEd charged
$4,904.69 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,716.64
BTW by switching TX to A fixed rate in June we saved approx 8k and July could be the same
06/01/12 $14,790.06 What PSE&G would have charged.
$9,683.98 What ConEd charged
$5,106.08 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,787.13
$4,577.90 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,602.27

07/12/12 $17,530.81 What PSE&G would have charged.
$17,331.12 What ConEd charged
$199.69 Savings multuiply by 35$% $69.89
$17,131.43 Savings multuiply by 35$% $5,996.00

08/12/12 $16,987.25 What PSE&G would have charged.
$14,511.92 What ConEd charged
$2,475.33 Savings multuiply by 35$% $866.37

09/12/12 $13,785.12 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,683.06 What ConEd charged
$3,102.06 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,085.72

10/12/12 $12,326.51 What PSE&G would have charged.
$8,723.52 What ConEd charged
$3,602.99 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,261.05

11/03/12 $15,530.36 What PSE&G would have charged.
$14,826.31 What ConEd charged
$704.05 Savings multuiply by 35$% $246.42

12/31/12 $16,276.47 What PSE&G would have charged.
$13,621.65 What ConEd charged
$2,654.82 Savings multuiply by 35$% $929.19
$10,966.83 Savings multuiply by 35$% $3,838.39

03/31/13 $16,355.57 What PSE&G would have charged.
$14,667.78 What ConEd charged
$1,687.79 Savings multuiply by 35$% $590.73
$12,979.99 Savings multuiply by 35$% $4,543.00

6-31-13 $13,659.72 What PSE&G would have charged.
$11,307.10 What ConEd charged
$2,352.62 Savings multuiply by 35$% $823.42
07/13/13
08/13/13 both moonths even out to 00.00

09/11/13 $13,478.43 What PSE&G would have charged.
$12,883.04 What ConEd charged
$595.39 Savings multuiply by 35$% $208.39

10/08/13 $12,148.88 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,541.45 What ConEd charged
$1,607.43 Savings multuiply by 35$% $562.60

11/05/13 $11,899.10 What PSE&G would have charged.
$11,403.05 What ConEd charged
$496.05 Savings multuiply by 35$% $173.62

12/11/13 $13,136.74 What PSE&G would have charged.
$15,008.28 What ConEd charged
-$1,871.54 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$655.04

01/13/14 $17,578.98 What PSE&G would have charged.
$18,147.79 What ConEd charged
-$568.81 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$199.08

2/9/2014 $50,768.90 What PSE&G would have charged.
$21,141.97 What ConEd charged
$29,626.93 Savings multuiply by 35$% $10,369.43

02/28/14 $27,295.05 What PSE&G would have charged.
$18,078.36 What ConEd charged
$9,216.69 Savings multuiply by 35$% $3,225.84

03/31/14 $28,807.53 What PSE&G would have charged.
$17,950.73 What ConEd charged
$10,856.80 Savings multuiply by 35$% $3,799.88

04/01/14 $12,926.51 What PSE&G would have charged.
$9,854.33 What ConEd charged
$3,072.18 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,075.26

05/31/14 $12,759.19 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,416.95 What ConEd charged
$2,342.24 Savings multuiply by 35$% $819.78

06/30/14 $14,093.39 What PSE&G would have charged.
$12,067.78 What ConEd charged
$2,025.61 Savings multuiply by 35$% $708.96

07/31/14 $16,590.46 What PSE&G would have charged.
$14,080.17 What ConEd charged
$2,510.29 Savings multuiply by 35$% $878.60

10/31/14 $12,230.71 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,144.10 What ConEd charged
$2,086.61 Savings multuiply by 35$% $730.31

11-31-14 $14,657.28 What PSE&G would have charged.
$13,331.39 What ConEd charged
$1,325.89 Savings multuiply by 35$% $464.06

12/31/14 $17,163.44 What PSE&G would have charged.
$18,323.86 What ConEd charged
-$1,160.42 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$406.15

01/31/15 $18,413.70 What PSE&G would have charged.
$21,217.96 What ConEd charged
-$2,804.26 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$981.49

02/28/15 $18,729.03 What PSE&G would have charged.
$19,951.89 What ConEd charged
-$1,222.86 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$428.00

03/31/15 $16,917.79 What PSE&G would have charged.
$16,581.33 What ConEd charged
$336.46 Savings multuiply by 35$% $117.76
No Con Ed april through June

07/31/15 $16,746.63 What PSE&G would have charged.
$15,868.69 What ConEd charged
$877.94 Savings multuiply by 35$% $307.28

08/31/15 $16,540.07 What PSE&G would have charged.
$15,022.06 What ConEd charged
$1,518.01 Savings multuiply by 35$% $531.30

09/30/15 $13,880.77 What PSE&G would have charged.
$13,340.87 What ConEd charged
$539.90 Savings multuiply by 35$% $188.97

10/30/15
$12,486.90 What PSE&G would have charged.
$11,169.78 What ConEd charged
$1,317.12 Savings multuiply by 35$% $460.99

11-31-15 $12,724.21 What PSE&G would have charged.
$11,872.49 What ConEd charged
$851.72 Savings multuiply by 35$% $298.10

12/31/15 $14,540.35 What PSE&G would have charged.
$13,622.12 What ConEd charged
$918.23 Savings multuiply by 35$% $321.38

01/31/16 $19,343.57 What PSE&G would have charged.
$16,774.61 What ConEd charged
$2,568.96 Savings multuiply by 35$% $899.14

2-31-16 $17,595.94 What PSE&G would have charged.
$16,774.61 What ConEd charged
$821.33 Savings multuiply by 35$% $287.47

03/31/16 $15,993.73 What PSE&G would have charged.
$9,635.74 What ConEd charged
$6,357.99 Savings multuiply by 35$% $2,225.30

$13,951.31 What PSE&G would have charged.
04/30/16 $9,089.95 What ConEd charged
$4,861.36 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,701.48
$6,717.89

5/30/2016 $13,667.39 What PSE&G would have charged.
$9,411.06 What ConEd charged
$4,256.33 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,489.72

6/30/2016 $16,276.23 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,934.50 What ConEd charged
$5,341.73 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,869.61

7-0-16 $17,646.86 What PSE&G would have charged.
$18,027.08 What ConEd charged
-$380.22 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$133.08
5-3–16 to 7-31-16 $3,226.24

8/30/2016 $18,099.25 What PSE&G would have charged.
$19,982.42 What ConEd charged
-$1,883.17 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$659.11

9/30/2016 $15,793.15 What PSE&G would have charged.
$14,937.17 What ConEd charged
$855.98 Savings multuiply by 35$% $299.59
$0.00

10/31/2016 $13,782.66 What PSE&G would have charged.
$11,723.00 What ConEd charged
$2,059.66 Savings multuiply by 35$% $720.88

11/30/2016 $14,439.70 What PSE&G would have charged.
$13,289.43 What ConEd charged
$1,150.27 Savings multuiply by 35$% $402.59
8-30-16 to11-30-16 $763.96

12/30/16 $18,326.37 What PSE&G would have charged.
$23,596.63 What ConEd charged
-$5,270.26 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$1,844.59
-$1,844.59

01/31/17 $18,836.37 What PSE&G would have charged.
$23,481.58 What ConEd charged
-$4,645.21 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$1,625.82
-$3,470.41

02/05/08 $18,854.80 What PSE&G would have charged.
$23,481.58 What ConEd charged
-$4,626.78 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$1,619.37
-$3,463.96

03/05/18 $15,785.77 What PSE&G would have charged.
$16,200.19 What ConEd charged
-$414.42 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$145.05
-$145.05

04/11/18 $17,390.20 What PSE&G would have charged.
$19,669.06 What ConEd charged
-$2,278.86 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$797.60
-$797.60

05/09/18 $13,001.00 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,545.51 What ConEd charged
$2,455.49 Savings multuiply by 35$% $859.42
$859.42

06/08/18 $13,761.00 What PSE&G would have charged.
$10,560.17 What ConEd charged
$3,200.83 Savings multuiply by 35$% $1,120.29
$1,120.29

07/09/18 $13,388.00 What PSE&G would have charged.
$12,494.03 What ConEd charged
$893.97 Savings multuiply by 35$% $312.89
-$159.05

08/08/18 $14,340.13 What PSE&G would have charged.
$14,794.56 What ConEd charged
-$454.43 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$159.05
-$159.05

08/31/18 $13,821.38 What PSE&G would have charged.
$13,454.24 What ConEd charged
$367.14 Savings multuiply by 35$% $128.50
$128.50

09/30/18 $12,232.88 What PSE&G would have charged.
$11,581.95 What ConEd charged
$650.93 Savings multuiply by 35$% $227.83
$1,348.12

10/31/18 $10,440.31 What PSE&G would have charged.
$9,412.93 What ConEd charged
$1,027.38 Savings multuiply by 35$% $359.58
$359.58

11/30/18 $15,216.69 What PSE&G would have charged.
$16,368.41 What ConEd charged
-$1,151.72 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$403.10
-$562.15

12/31/18 $20,094.01 What PSE&G would have charged.
$22,404.41 What ConEd charged
-$2,310.40 Savings multuiply by 35$% -$808.64
-$967.69

Refund of $3884.00 is due for Oct. Nov. Dec 2017 $3,884.00
from East Coast Power $4,111.83

A 120 second video thst has saved our clients 100’s of thousands dollars

Here are two videos that succinctly explain what we do for our clients. I hope you find them helpful.
First video on auditing
– https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7S2PmT_Wo7fU3g2b25ybjdTMWc/view?usp=sharing
Second video on cloud services/IT
– https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7S2PmT_Wo7fcTJHeEVHUTBVekk/view?usp=sharing
Just hit control and then click
Thanks for watching,

What is unified communications UC

Unified communications, UC, “bridging the gap,” communications and collaboration, integrated communications … it’s being talked about everywhere – magazine articles, news snippets, tradeshows, software manufacturers and hardware manufacturers, among others. If you are in the phone, e-mail, chat, mobile or any other communications-related business, you’re being barraged by the term “unified communications.”
There is a wide disparity in perceptions in the marketplace as to what unified communications (UC) really is. The big picture is that UC is bringing in voice, video, workflow applications, social networking, etc. – all different forms of communications – to mediate one solution or interface. This is not an easy task, as it takes a lot of time, and companies need to chip away at each of these, working to get each one under their wings.
Unified communications will change the way you communicate, making you and your employees more productive and efficient in your day-to-day business activities. Easily start a video conference call with a co-worker and have a question asked and answered in seconds rather than minutes by not having to walk over to their desk or another floor, exchange the usual hellos and short talk and then get to the task at hand. By using these robust communications all of that fluff is no longer needed and it creates more efficiency in how people work. Get it done quickly and see the savings in quality of communications – things that would’ve been more difficult to explain over the phone are much easier to share face-to-face with video conferencing, sharing boards, etc. UC offers efficient use of employee time and less distractions outside of the traditional business requirements. It’s amazing how people don’t realize how inefficient they can be when they are relying on just voice alone.

Is Azure or AWS good for your company?

Azure is very good for some companies but it could be costly. It also needs to be managed by someone. There are many third parties that manage Azure but add a premium to that service. Not all verticals or companies should go to Azure and they should opt opt for a private cloud.
This is the opinion of a CIO at a 600+ CPA firm. He appreciates the service received from one of our vendors where the host his telecom as well as servers.

The IT dept is now more able to think strategically because of the time savings